Last Modified 17 December 1999
Skip to the computational details
So far we've looked at the energy of the hcp Titanium lattice as a function of a and c (or V and c/a), keeping the full P63/mmc symmetry of the hcp lattice. This allowed us to over-determine the elastic constants
Just as in Example 4, finding C11 - C12 requires varying e1 and e2. Like Example 4, we can do this strain and keep volume conservation. Unlike Example 4, we cannot choose a strain such that E(-x) = E(x). Looking at the pre-defined strains table we see that static as options ``21'' and ``-21'' which handle this. We'll use option 21:
e1 | = | [(1+x)/(1-x)]½ - 1 | |
e2 | = | [(1-x)/(1+x)]½ - 1 | (1) |
e3-6 | = | 0 |
The strained hcp lattice then has the form
a1 | = ( | ½ a (1+e1), | - ½ 3½ a (1+e2), | 0) | |
a2 | = ( | ½ a (1+e1), | - ½ 3½ a (1+e2), | 0) | . (2) |
a3 | = ( | 0 , | 0 , | c ) |
Since C22 = C11 in an hcp lattice,
the energy-strain relationship is thus
E(x) = E0 + V0 (C11-C12)
x2 + O[x3] . (3) The procedure should now be familiar. We change x, construct a
new lattice (2), calculate the energy, repeat, and fit the results
to (3). Unfortunately, one little problem emerges from all of this:
(2) is not a hexagonal lattice. Instead, it is now a base-centered
orthorhombic lattice. If we plug in the equilibrium positions of
the basis vectors,
B1 = 1/3
a1 + 2/3 a2 + 1/4
a3 = ( ½ (1+e1)
a , ½ 3-½ (1+e2) , ¼ c
)
B2 = 2/3
a1 + 1/3 a2 + 3/4
a3 = ( ½ (1+e1)
a , -½ 3-½ (1+e2) , ¾ c
) , (4)
What makes life difficult is that atoms on the 4m sites are not fixed in space. The Crystallographic tables say that the atoms have positions (0,±y,±¼), where y is free to change. In terms of the basis vectors (4) this translates into
B1 | = | (1/3 - u) a1 + (2/3 + u) a2 + 1/4 a3 | = | ( ½ (1+e1) a , ½ 3-½ (1+e2) (1+2u), ¼ c ) | |
B2 | = | 2/3 a1 + 1/3 a2 + 3/4 a3 | = | ( ½ (1+e1) a , -½ 3-½ (1+e2) (1+2u), ¾ c ) | , (5) |
In order to find the elastic constant C11-C12, then, we must first find the minimum energy E(x,u) at fixed x, and use this value as the E(x) in (3). This is very reminiscent of the minimization procedure required to obtain the equation of state for hcp Titanium. We'll pursue this in all its computational glory next.
Go on to the computational details.
Go back to the Example X home page.
Look at other examples.
Get other parameters from the Tight-binding periodic table.
Return to the static Reference Manual.